(Revised 7/1/2025 Release 25.14)
(N.D.A.C. Section 75-02-02.1-32)
Determining the exact value of assets can be challenging, but establishing a value is necessary for eligibility purposes. The applicant or recipient must provide a reliable valuation for each asset needed to determine eligibility. Since they may not know asset values or may have a strong interest in a specific value, these amounts must be verified. If the provided valuation differs significantly from common sources, the reason for the difference must be explained. Without reliable asset value information, eligibility cannot be determined. Useful verification sources include:
Accounts maintained by banking facilities
When establishing eligibility, the value of liquid assets is determined using the account records provided. If the verification includes more than one balance for the month for which eligibility is being determined, the lowest balance is used. If the applicant or recipient has excess assets, subtract any monthly income that was deposited into the account. Income subtracted from the account, however, cannot be deducted from a balance prior to the date the income was deposited.
Example: The low balance in an account is on May 2. The monthly income is deposited on May 7. The next low balance is on May 30. The monthly income cannot be subtracted from May 2 low balance, but it can be subtracted from the May 30 balance.
If an applicant or recipient provides verification of checks that were recently written, but that have not cleared the account by the end of the month, those expenditures can be used to further reduce the value of the account.
Publicly traded stocks, bonds, and securities: Stockbrokers.
Motor vehicles, mobile homes, boats, or any other property listed in published valuation guides accepted in the trade: Kelly Blue Book, NADA, etc.
Use the "average trade-in" value for the vehicle without using any add- ons or deductions. The applicant or recipient may also provide verification of the true value from a reliable source if the vehicle is no longer listed in the valuation guide or if the applicant or recipient has reason to believe that the estimate is inaccurate.
Harvested grains or produce: grain buyers, grain elevator operators, produce buyers; and, for crops grown on contract: the contract.
Stock in corporations not publicly traded: appraisers, accountants.
Contractual rights to receive money payments: If payments are current, the contract, and if payments are not current, see 05-70-40.
Other personal property: dealers and buyers of that property.
Life insurance policies: the insurance company.
(1) Fair market value is the value established by good faith effort to sell. The best offer received establishes the value.
(2) A good faith effort to sell means offering the mineral interests to at least three companies purchasing mineral rights in the area, or by offering for bids through public advertisement.
(1) If producing, the value is an amount equal to any lease income received after the transfer plus three times the annual royalty income.
(a) Based on actual royalty income from the 60 months following the transfer; or
(b) If 60 months have not yet passed, based on actual royalty income for the months that have already passed, and an estimate for the remainder of the 60 month period.
(2) If not producing, but mineral rights are leased, two times the lease amount (based on the actual lease and not the yearly lease amount) that was in place at the time of the transfer.
Example: John Oilslick leased his mineral acres in 2008 for $3000. He transferred his mineral rights to his adult children in January 2010. The children have a new lease on these acres effective January 2011 for $10,000. The disqualifying transfer is equal to two times the $3,000 lease that was in place at the time of the transfer.
(3) If not leased, the greater of two times the estimated lease amount, or the potential sale value of the mineral rights, as determined by a geologist, mineral broker, or mineral appraiser at the time of the transfer, whichever is greater.
Example: Don Goldmine had his mineral acres valued at $50,000 in 2010 when he transferred them to his children. Today those minerals are valued at $20,000. The amount of the disqualifying transfer would be $50,000, the value at the time of the transfer.
Example: Mary Golddigger leased her mineral acres in June 2008 for $5,000 under a 3-year lease. Two months before the lease expired -- April 2011, she transferred those acres to her daughter, Nugget Golddigger. Nugget then leased those acres for $20,000. In this situation, at the time of transfer, Mary probably reasonably would be aware of the lease renewal amounts. Even if she didn't know, it is likely that the value was closer to the $20,000 than $5,000. The eligibility worker must get information of the estimated value as of the date of the transfer. The value of the disqualifying transfer at 2 X the newer lease amount of $20,000 equals $40,000.
Example: A 75-year-old individual transfers a remainder interest in property, valued at $80,000, to his children and keeps a life estate interest. Using the table, the value of the remainder interest is $38,280.80 ($80,000 x .47851 = $38,280.80). That is the amount he gave to his children and is the amount of the disqualifying transfer. He still owns the life estate interest, which has a value of $41,719.20.
Equity in the property must also be considered when determining the amount of the transfer. If there is a loan against the property that is assumed by the remaindermen as part of the transfer, then the amount of the loan is considered compensation received. If the life tenant retains the loan obligation, the full value of the remainder interest is the amount transferred.
Example: A 75-year-old transfers a remainder interest in property, valued at $80,000, to his children and keeps a life estate interest. He has a $20,000 mortgage on the property, which he is still obligated to pay. Using the table, the value of the remainder interest is $38,280.80 ($80,000 x .47851 = $38,280.80) and is the value of what he transferred away. He still owns the life estate interest, which has a value of $41,719.20, but he only has $21,719.20 in equity ($41,719.20 - $20,000 loan). If the children who received the remainder interest also assumed the mortgage, the children actually are giving compensation, so the uncompensated amount of the transfer is only $18,280.80 ($38,280.80- $20,000 loan = $18,280.80).