Contractual Rights to Receive Money Payments
510-05-70-40
(Revised 1/1/18 ML #3508)
View Archives
(N.D.A.C. Sections 75-02-02.1-30 and 75-02-02.1-32(5))
- For various reasons, but usually because
an applicant or recipient has sold property with a contract to receive
a series of payments, rather than one payment, an applicant or recipient
may own contractual rights to receive money payments. If the applicant
or recipient has sold property, and received in return a promise of payments
of money at a later date, usually to be made periodically, and an attendant
promise to return the property if the payments are not made, the arrangement
is usually called a "contract for deed". The essential feature
of the contract for deed is the right to receive future payments, usually
coupled with a right to get the property back if the payments are not
made. Contractual rights to receive money payments also arise out of other
types of transactions. The valuable contract document may be called a
note, accounts receivable, mortgage, or by some other name.
Some contractual
rights may be written so the lender has the right to demand payment at
any time. If so, the note is considered a demand note and can be called
in at any time. If a note is written so the lender does not have the right
to demand payment but the note is in default, it also becomes a demand
note. Contractual rights may or may not have collateral or security to
guarantee payment.
- A
contractual right to receive money payments is considered an available
asset, subject to the asset limits, unless the Medicaid unit is requesting
coverage of nursing care services and the contract itself must be considered
a disqualifying transfer (see subsection 4). When the penalty period is
finished, and the applicant or recipient still owns the contractual right
to receive the money payments, the contractual right is considered an
available asset.
- Contract
values.
- The value of
a contract in which payments are current is equal to the total of all
outstanding payments of principal required to be made by the contract,
unless evidence is furnished that establishes a lower value.
- The value of a contract in which payments
are not current is an amount equal to the current fair market value of
the property subject to the contract. If the contract is not secured
by property, the value of the contract is the total of all outstanding
payments of principal and past due interest required to be made by the
contract.
- In situations
where the contractual right to receive money payments is not collectable
and is not secured and the debtor does not have any assets such as money in a bank account or real property, is not working or has a very low paying job or the only other source(s) of income are exempt from seizure by judgment creditors, the debt has no collectable value, and thus no countable
asset value. An applicant or recipient can establish that a note has no
collectable value if:
- The
debtor is judgment proof. A debtor is judgment proof when money judgments
have been secured, an execution has been served against the debtor which has been returned as wholly unsatisfied, and the debtors affidavit and claims for exemptions exempt all of the debtors property or as determined by the department including but not limited to:
- Has no legal rights to pursue payment of debts by garnishing wages or other sources of income that are not exempt from garnishment;
-
Cannot place a levy on bank accounts, and/or
-
Cannot place a lien against any real estate that the individual owns.
- The
applicant or recipient verifies the debt is uncollectible due to a statute
of limitations. A satisfactory verification includes an attorney’s letter
identifying the statute and facts that make a debt uncollectible due to
a statute of limitations.
Applicants and recipients should be encouraged
not to forgive debts that have been determined to be uncollectible. Such
debts could have a future value if the debtor ever accrues assets. At
each annual review, determine whether the judgments are still on file
or whether the debtor has any change in assets.
- The
purchase or establishment of a contract may be a disqualifying transfer
if the owner, or the owner’s spouse, is requesting coverage for nursing
care services and the contract was purchased or established on or after
the look-back date (as defined in 05-80-10).
- A disqualifying
transfer will be determined to have occurred if the value of the contract
at the time it was purchased or established, plus any compensation received
at that time, was less than the value of the property exchanged for the
contract. The
difference is the amount of the transfer.
Example:
Mr.
Green sells land to his children on a contract for deed. The
land has a fair market value of $100,000. The
contract required a $5,000 down payment and the value of the remaining
payments adds up to $60,000. $100,000
less $60,000 (value of contract), and less $5,000 (down payment), leaves
a difference of $35,000. Mr.
Green made a $35,000 disqualifying transfer when he established the contract.
- Except for
annuities (see 05-70-45), a contractual right to receive money payments
that consists of a promissory note, loan, or mortgage is a disqualifying
transfer unless:
- All
payments due on the contract are expected to be made within the owners
life expectancy as established using the tables at 05-100-75;
- The
contract provides for equal payments and does not provide for a balloon
or deferred payment; and
- The
contract cannot be cancelled, or the payments diminished, upon the lender’s
death.
The uncompensated value of a contract that is considered
a disqualifying transfer is an amount equal to the remaining payments
due from the contract.
Example:
When Mr.
Green sold his land to his children on a contract for deed, the contract
included a clause that no further payments would be due on the contract
when he passed away. Because
of this clause, the contract is considered a disqualifying transfer. $55,000
is still due on the contract, so the amount of the transfer is $55,000.
As is shown in the above two examples, Mr. Green
made two transfers. The
first transfer was because he did not receive fair market value for the
property, thus he made a $35,000 transfer. The
second transfer was because of the cancellation clause, which results
in a $55,000 transfer. These
two transfers are combined for a total transfer of $90,000.
If the entire contract itself is considered a disqualifying
transfer that results in a penalty period, the contract is not also considered
an available asset.
- There is a presumption that the holder's
interest in contractual rights to receive money payments is saleable without
working an undue hardship. This presumption may be rebutted by evidence
demonstrating that the contractual rights are not saleable without working
an undue hardship, or in the case of an annuity, by establishing its countable
value for Medicaid purposes (see 05-70-45-15 for valuation of annuities)
(see 05-70-30(2) for more information regarding property that is not saleable
without working an undue hardship).
When offering contractual rights for sale, they
must first be offered to co-owners, joint owners, or occupiers. If no
buyer is secured, the contract must be offered for sale by public advertisement.
The following content is acceptable as a means of demonstrating a good
faith effort to sell a contract for deed:
Example 1:
Offered at 75% of value.
For Sale: Seller's interest in contract for deed.
Secured by W ½ of Sec. 65-13-120. Remaining payments of $18,000 are due
in annual installments on Nov. 1, 2006 through 2010. Will consider offers
which exceed $13,500. Call 555-3333 or write Box 12, Tampa Gazette, Tampa,
ND 58990.
Example 2:
Offered at 100% of value.
For Sale: Seller's interest in contract for deed.
Secured by W ½ of Sec. 65-13-120. Remaining payments of $18,000 are due
in annual installments on Nov. 1, 2006 through 2010. Call 555-3333 or
write Box 12, Tampa Gazette, Tampa, ND 58990.
- If an asset is
sold in exchange for a contractual right to receive money payments, the
principal payments received constitute a converted
asset. (The interest portion of the payments is considered unearned
income.)