Skip to main content
Skip to navigation
Return to top
Return to Home
Students & Parents
Educational Equity & Support
Title I A: Disadvantaged Children Meet High Standards
The Title I law requires school districts with more than one school attendance area for each grade span to meet Title I comparability requirements. The schedule for reviewing comparability requirement at the state department has been moved from spring to winter, so that if we encounter problems with comparability reports, there is still time to make changes before the school year ends.
Title I comparability requirements state that a school district may receive Title I funds only if
state and local
funds will be used in schools receiving Title I funds to provide services that, taken as a whole, are at least comparable to services in schools that are not receiving Title I funds. If the district is serving all schools under Title I, they may receive Title I funds only if they will use
state and local
funds to provide services that, taken as a whole, are substantially comparable in each school.
The comparability regulations include documenting compliance in the following three areas:
A local educational agency-wide salary schedule;
Ensuring equivalence among schools in teachers, administrators, and other staff; and
Ensuring equivalence among schools in the provision of curriculum materials and instructional supplies.
Comparability reports are to be submitted and reviewed at the end of each school year. Meeting comparability is a prerequisite to receiving approval on your subsequent year’s consolidated application, which is processed during the summer. Demonstrating comparability is an annual requirement.
Previously, school districts were informed that they could develop and submit a policy to ensure that the comparability requirements were met on an annual basis. However, when the USDE released final fiscal guidance which addresses the comparability requirements and outlines new USDE expectations, the guidance states that all districts must actually perform the calculations necessary each and every year to demonstrate that all of its Title I schools are, in fact, comparable. Therefore, districts will need to submit actual documentation (not a policy) for each of the three comparability components listed above.
Under ESSA, (section 1118(b), Title I, Part A, supplement, not supplant has been amended and now a methodology test which does not require districts to identify individual costs or services is required. A district must provide a written methodology they are using for compliance with this provision.
North Dakota School Districts Required to Meet Comparability and Supplement, not Supplant Requirements
Bismarck Public School District
Devils Lake Public School District
Dickinson Public School District
Fargo Public School District
Grand Forks Public School District
Jamestown Public School District
Mandan Public School District
Minot Public School District
West Fargo Public School District
Williston Public School District
Supplement, Not Supplant Guidance - PDF
Comparability Report Parts
Comparability Part 1
Comparability Part 2
Comparability Part 3
Statement of Assurance
Supplement, not Supplant Methodology
ND Department of Public Instruction Home Page
North Dakota Department of Public Instruction
Kirsten Baesler, State Superintendent
600 E. Boulevard Avenue, Dept. 201
Bismarck, North Dakota 58505-0440