|
North Dakota GIS Hub Web Services Report
Last Updated February 7, 2008 06:31 PM
|
| Monthly SummaryTop |
| The Monthly Summary summarizes the important data for the month. |
| Map Services |
Pesticide |
| Number of Image Requests |
96 |
| Number of Layers |
17 |
| Most Popular Layer (Image) |
Counties, Cities, State and Federal Roads (90 images)
|
| Least Popular Layer (Image) |
11 Layers Found. (70 images)
| PLSS Sections, No Aquifer, Lakes,Ponds,Rivers, Townships, Low Organic Matter, Low Pesticide, Rivers and Streams, Other Surface Water, Intermediate Pesticide, High Recharge, High Permeability |
|
| Average Request Time |
792 ms |
| Fastest Layer |
Counties, Cities (19 ms)
|
| Slowest Layer |
High Pesticide (935 ms)
|
| Number of Errors: |
0 |
| Number of Warnings: |
2 |
|
|
| Requests Per DayTop |
| The Requests Per Day module shows the number of requests in the month, broken down for each day. |
|
|
Requests
| Map Service | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Subtotal |
| Pesticide | | 25 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | | | | 1 | | | 2 | 22 | | | 69 |
| Total | 0 | 25 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 69 |
| | | Map Service | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | Subtotal | Total |
| Pesticide | 1 | | 3 | 4 | | | | 1 | | 6 | | | | 11 | 1 | | 27 | 96 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | | 27 | 96 |
|
|
|
| Layer SummaryTop |
| The Layer Summary module shows detailed information for each layer, grouped by map service. |
Map Service: Pesticide
Popularity Rank
Layer Name |
Layer Hit Count |
Total Search Time |
Average Search Time |
Total Retrieval Time |
Average Retrieval Time |
Total Time |
Average Time |
| 1 |
Counties |
70 |
4.157 |
0.059 |
13.629 |
0.194 |
17.786 |
0.254 |
| 2 |
State and Federal Roads |
70 |
4.185 |
0.059 |
20.869 |
0.298 |
25.055 |
0.357 |
| 3 |
Cities |
47 |
0.677 |
0.014 |
0.237 |
0.005 |
0.914 |
0.019 |
| 4 |
High Pesticide |
29 |
4.637 |
0.159 |
22.499 |
0.775 |
27.137 |
0.935 |
| 5 |
Towns and Cities |
24 |
0.486 |
0.020 |
0.186 |
0.007 |
0.673 |
0.028 |
| 6 |
County and City Roads |
15 |
1.013 |
0.067 |
8.610 |
0.574 |
9.624 |
0.641 |
| 7 |
Highlighted Feature |
12 |
0.703 |
0.058 |
0.030 |
0.002 |
0.734 |
0.061 |
| 8 |
Interstate Ramps |
7 |
0.079 |
0.011 |
0.014 |
0.002 |
0.094 |
0.013 |
| 9 |
Intermediate Pesticide |
1 |
0.468 |
0.468 |
0.016 |
0.016 |
0.484 |
0.484 |
| 10 |
High Permeability |
1 |
0.140 |
0.140 |
0.140 |
0.140 |
0.280 |
0.280 |
Note:
Layers shown (in highlighted text) are Dynamic layers not present in the AXL configuration file / MXD file.
Rows shown like this indicate layers that are visible by default in the mapservice. |
|
| Average Requests Per HourTop |
| Average Requests Per Hour shows the number of requests made to the map services average by the number of days for which there is data. |
 |
| Hour | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| Requests | 0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
| Layer Processing TimeTop |
| The Layer Processing Time module breaks down the total cumulative processing time in seconds for the 15 most expensive layers. |
 |
| | Name | Search Time | Retrieval Time | | 1 | High Pesticide | 0.296 | 3.609 | | 2 | County and City Roads | 0.140 | 1.407 | | 3 | State and Federal Roads | 0.047 | 0.672 | | 4 | Intermediate Pesticide | 0.468 | 0.016 | | 5 | Counties | 0.140 | 0.343 | | 6 | High Permeability | 0.140 | 0.140 | | 7 | Towns and Cities | 0.014 | 0.016 | | 8 | Highlighted Feature | 0.016 | 0.014 | | 9 | Cities | 0.016 | 0.000 | | 10 | Interstate Ramps | 0.016 | 0.000 | |
|
|
| ProcessingTimeTop |
| The ProcessingTime module breaks down the total processing time in seconds for this report. |
| Total | Average | | AXL Parse | 2.206 | 0.023 |
| Renderer Setup | 0.094 | 0.001 |
| Processing | 83.793 | 0.873 |
| Output | 16.312 | 0.170 |
|  |
|
|
| These reports are powered by licensed Geocortex® Statistics technology |
